👨👩👧 Issue
Pensions, family and welfare: what each party thinks
4 questions, 28 party positions and 4 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
Disagrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”
In between: “University education should be free for all students”
Disagrees: “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
In between: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “University education should be free for all students”
Agrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “University education should be free for all students”
Disagrees: “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
Disagrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”; “University education should be free for all students”
Agrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “University education should be free for all students”
Disagrees: “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
Agrees: “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “University education should be free for all students”
Disagrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”
In between: “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
Agrees: “Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments”
Disagrees: “Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it”; “Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children”; “University education should be free for all students”
Pensions should rise faster, even if taxes have to go up to pay for it.
State pensions rise every year by a formula that takes into account price rises and social tax revenue. Some parties propose extra increases on top of that formula.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 1 in between and 4 against.
-
Reformierakond AgainstReformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 42 Why
-
EKRE In betweenEKRE 2023. aasta Riigikogu valimiste programm «Päästame Eesti!», ptk I Why
-
Keskerakond In favourKeskerakonna KOV2025 valimisplatvorm «Ummikust välja!», lk 14–15 Why
-
Eesti 200 Strongly againstERR, 18.09.2024: Kristina Kallas: peame hakkama pensioni indeksit üle vaatama Why
-
SDE Strongly in favourSotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 14 Why
-
Isamaa AgainstIsamaa Euroopa Parlamendi valimisprogramm 2024 «Õigele teele!», lk 10 Why
-
Parempoolsed Strongly againstParempoolsete rahandusplaan, parempoolsed.ee, 17.07.2026 Why
Families with three or more children should receive much larger benefits than families with one or two children.
In 2024 the government cut the large-family allowance, which had been raised sharply in 2022. Some parties want to restore it to boost the birth rate; others prefer to share benefits equally among all children.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 1 in between and 4 against.
-
Reformierakond AgainstReformierakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 44 Why
-
EKRE In betweenEKRE fraktsiooni eelnõu 1039 SE (perehüvitiste seaduse muutmine) seletuskiri, 30.09.2026 Why
-
Keskerakond In favourKeskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», sotsiaalpoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 Strongly againstEesti 200 Riigikogu valimiste programm 2023, „Perepoliitika“ Why
-
SDE AgainstSotsiaaldemokraatide plaan „Iga laps loeb!“, 2026, lk 9 Why
-
Isamaa Strongly in favourERR, 08.05.2023: Isamaa tõi riigikogu ette meeleavaldusele lapsed ja kärud Why
-
Parempoolsed Strongly againstLavly Perlingu kõne Parempoolsete volikogul, parempoolsed.ee, 14.03.2026 Why
Healthcare should rely more on people's own responsibility, for example through higher patient co-payments.
Public healthcare is funded mainly by the social tax on workers, and the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) is running a deficit. One option is for patients to pay more; another is for the state to put in more money.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 1 in between and 4 against.
-
Reformierakond In favourReformierakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 46 Why
-
EKRE AgainstEKRE 2023. aasta Riigikogu valimiste programm «Päästame Eesti!», ptk IV Why
-
Keskerakond Strongly againstKeskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», tervishoiupoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 AgainstEesti 200 Riigikogu valimiste programm 2023, „Tervise- ja sotsiaalpoliitika“ Why
-
SDE Strongly againstRiina Sikkut, „Kahekiiruselises tervishoius kaotavad nii patsiendid kui arstid“, SDE ajaleht Suve Sõnumid, 2025, lk 2 Why
-
Isamaa In betweenIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 22–24 Why
-
Parempoolsed Strongly in favourParempoolsete tervishoiu programm, parempoolsed.ee, 06.08.2026 Why
University education should be free for all students.
Today public university education is free for full-time students on Estonian-language programmes; in other cases universities can charge tuition fees.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 2 in between and 2 against.
-
Reformierakond In betweenReformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 12 Why
-
EKRE In betweenEKRE põhiprogramm «Konservatiivne programm», lk 5 Why
-
Keskerakond In favourKeskerakonna KOV2025 valimisplatvorm «Ummikust välja!», lk 4 Why
-
Eesti 200 AgainstERR, 11.08.2024: Enamiku erakondade juhid soovivad teatud erialadel tasulist kõrgharidust Why
-
SDE Strongly in favourSotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 11 Why
-
Isamaa In favourERR, 11.08.2024: Enamiku erakondade juhid soovivad teatud erialadel tasulist kõrgharidust Why
-
Parempoolsed Strongly againstParempoolsete juhtimiskava, parempoolsed.ee, 08.05.2025 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 4 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test