🌍 Issue
Migration: what each party thinks
2 questions, 14 party positions and no complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Disagrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Agrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Disagrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Agrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Disagrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Agrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Disagrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
In between: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”; “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Agrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Disagrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Agrees: “Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff”
Disagrees: “The annual immigration quota should not be increased”
Estonia should make it easier to hire workers from outside the EU when companies cannot find staff.
The arrival of workers from outside the EU is limited by an annual quota and, in many cases, by a minimum required salary. Companies want more flexibility; others fear it would push wages down or make integration harder.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 1 in between and 3 against.
-
Reformierakond In favourReformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 8 Why
-
EKRE Strongly againstERR, 14.03.2026: EKRE volikogu keskendus riigikogu valimistele Why
-
Keskerakond AgainstKeskerakonna programm (keskerakond.ee/erakonnast/programm), rändepoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 In favourRiigikogu hääletus 785 SE (välismaalaste seaduse muutmine, tööjõupuudusega tegevusalade erisus), lõpphääletus 04.05.2026 Why
-
SDE In betweenRiigikogu hääletus, välistööjõu toomist lihtsustav seadus, 04.05.2026 (ERR) Why
-
Isamaa Strongly againstIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 14 Why
-
Parempoolsed In favourParempoolsete rahvastikupoliitika plaan, parempoolsed.ee, 07.08.2026 Why
The annual immigration quota should not be increased.
Each year the law caps residence permits for people from outside the EU at around 0.1% of the population (about 1,300 places). There are exceptions, for example for specialists, students and researchers.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 1 in between and 3 against.
-
Reformierakond AgainstRiigikogu hääletus 785 SE (välismaalaste seaduse muutmine, tööjõupuudusega tegevusalade erisus), lõpphääletus 04.05.2026 Why
-
EKRE Strongly in favourEKRE rahvastikuprogramm 2023 «Päästame Eesti rahvusriigi!», ptk IV Why
-
Keskerakond In favourKeskerakonna programm (keskerakond.ee/erakonnast/programm), rändepoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 AgainstRiigikogu hääletus 785 SE (välismaalaste seaduse muutmine, tööjõupuudusega tegevusalade erisus), lõpphääletus 04.05.2026 Why
-
SDE In betweenRiigikogu hääletus, välistööjõu toomist lihtsustav seadus, 04.05.2026 (ERR) Why
-
Isamaa Strongly in favourIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 14 Why
-
Parempoolsed AgainstParempoolsete rahvastikupoliitika plaan, parempoolsed.ee, 07.08.2026 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. Answer them and see which parties you agree with.
Take the political test