🗣️ Issue
Language and integration: what each party thinks
5 questions, 35 party positions and 3 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Disagrees: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”
Disagrees: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Agrees: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Disagrees: “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”
In between: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
In between: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”
In between: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”
Disagrees: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Agrees: “All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian”; “People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not”; “Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate”; “Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country”
Disagrees: “It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship”
All schooling should switch to Estonian by 2030, including in schools where most pupils speak Russian.
Since 2024 Russian-language kindergartens and schools have been switching to teaching in Estonian; the law says the transition must be complete by 2030. The debate is about the pace, the shortage of teachers and whether to keep mother-tongue lessons.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 1 in between and 0 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Reformierakond | Strongly in favour | Reformierakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 30 Why |
| EKRE | Strongly in favour | EKRE 2023. aasta Riigikogu valimiste programm «Päästame Eesti!», ptk III Why |
| Keskerakond | In between | Keskerakonna KOV2025 valimisplatvorm «Ummikust välja!», lk 11 Why |
| Eesti 200 | Strongly in favour | Eesti 200 Riigikogu valimiste programm 2023, „Haridus ja teadus“ Why |
| SDE | In favour | Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 10 Why |
| Isamaa | Strongly in favour | Isamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 7 Why |
| Parempoolsed | Strongly in favour | Parempoolsed: Tallinna linnavalitsuse plaan võib seada ohtu 7000 noore tuleviku, parempoolsed.ee, 14.05.2026 Why |
-
Reformierakond Strongly in favourReformierakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 30 Why
-
EKRE Strongly in favourEKRE 2023. aasta Riigikogu valimiste programm «Päästame Eesti!», ptk III Why
-
Keskerakond In betweenKeskerakonna KOV2025 valimisplatvorm «Ummikust välja!», lk 11 Why
-
Eesti 200 Strongly in favourEesti 200 Riigikogu valimiste programm 2023, „Haridus ja teadus“ Why
-
SDE In favourSotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 10 Why
-
Isamaa Strongly in favourIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 7 Why
-
Parempoolsed Strongly in favourParempoolsed: Tallinna linnavalitsuse plaan võib seada ohtu 7000 noore tuleviku, parempoolsed.ee, 14.05.2026 Why
It should be easier for people who have lived in Estonia since before 1991 to obtain Estonian citizenship.
After independence was restored, people who arrived in the Soviet era and their descendants had to pass exams in Estonian and the Constitution to become citizens. Tens of thousands of residents still have undetermined citizenship (the "grey passport").
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 1 in favour, 2 in between and 4 against.
-
Reformierakond AgainstReformierakonna programm (põhiprogramm), 2005, lk 10 Why
-
EKRE Strongly againstRiigikogu hääletus 932 SE (kodakondsuse seaduse muutmine), esimese lugemise tagasilükkamine 15.09.2026 Why
-
Keskerakond Strongly in favourKeskerakonna programm (keskerakond.ee/erakonnast/programm), kodakondsuspoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 In betweenRiigikogu hääletus 932 SE (kodakondsuse seaduse muutmine), esimese lugemise tagasilükkamine 15.09.2026 Why
-
SDE In betweenSotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna valimisprogramm 2023, lk 21 Why
-
Isamaa Strongly againstHelir-Valdor Seederi kõne Riigikogus kodakondsuse seaduse muutmise eelnõu esimesel lugemisel, 15.09.2026 (Eesti Uudised) Why
-
Parempoolsed AgainstERR Valijakompass 2023, erakonna vastus (väide 14) Why
People who work with customers should be required to speak Estonian, with higher fines if they do not.
The Language Act already requires customer service to be provided in Estonian. The government has proposed changes that raise the fines for breaking this rule.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 1 in between and 1 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Reformierakond | In favour | Reformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 14 Why |
| EKRE | Strongly in favour | EKRE fraktsiooni eelnõu 1 SE (keeleseaduse muutmine) seletuskiri, 11.04.2023 Why |
| Keskerakond | Against | Keskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», rahvastikupoliitika Why |
| Eesti 200 | In favour | Riigikogu hääletus 740 SE (keeleseaduse muutmine), lõpphääletus 17.06.2026 Why |
| SDE | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Isamaa | Strongly in favour | Isamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 7 Why |
| Parempoolsed | In favour | Parempoolsete valimisprogramm 2023, peatükk «Positiivne rahvuslus», parempoolsed.ee Why |
-
Reformierakond In favourReformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 14 Why
-
EKRE Strongly in favourEKRE fraktsiooni eelnõu 1 SE (keeleseaduse muutmine) seletuskiri, 11.04.2023 Why
-
Keskerakond AgainstKeskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», rahvastikupoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 In favourRiigikogu hääletus 740 SE (keeleseaduse muutmine), lõpphääletus 17.06.2026 Why
-
SDE In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Isamaa Strongly in favourIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 7 Why
-
Parempoolsed In favourParempoolsete valimisprogramm 2023, peatükk «Positiivne rahvuslus», parempoolsed.ee Why
Churches in Estonia should be required to cut their ties with the Moscow Patriarchate.
In 2025 the Riigikogu passed changes to the Churches and Congregations Act banning churches in Estonia from being subordinate to a foreign religious centre that threatens security, with the Moscow Patriarchate in mind. Critics say they restrict religious freedom.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 0 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Reformierakond | Strongly in favour | Riigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why |
| EKRE | Strongly against | ERR, 09.04.2025: Martin Helme: kirikute ja koguduste uus seadus on vastuolus usuvabadusega Why |
| Keskerakond | Strongly against | Riigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why |
| Eesti 200 | Strongly in favour | Riigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why |
| SDE | Strongly in favour | Riigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why |
| Isamaa | Strongly in favour | Riigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muutmise seadus, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why |
| Parempoolsed | In favour | Estimated position Why |
-
Reformierakond Strongly in favourRiigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why
-
EKRE Strongly againstERR, 09.04.2025: Martin Helme: kirikute ja koguduste uus seadus on vastuolus usuvabadusega Why
-
Keskerakond Strongly againstRiigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why
-
Eesti 200 Strongly in favourRiigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why
-
SDE Strongly in favourRiigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muudatused, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why
-
Isamaa Strongly in favourRiigikogu hääletus, kirikute ja koguduste seaduse muutmise seadus, 09.04.2025 (ERR) Why
-
Parempoolsed In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Estonian citizens should be allowed to also hold the citizenship of another EU or NATO country.
The law generally does not allow Estonians to hold another citizenship, although citizens by birth cannot be stripped of Estonian citizenship. There is a debate about allowing it for allied countries, for Estonians living abroad.
Of the 7 parties with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 1 in between and 2 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Reformierakond | In favour | Reformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 8 Why |
| EKRE | Against | EKRE põhiprogramm «Konservatiivne programm», lk 1 Why |
| Keskerakond | In favour | Keskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», rahvastikupoliitika Why |
| Eesti 200 | Strongly in favour | Eesti 200: „Kristina Kallas erakonna volikogul: suurem tossutamine ja kestlik keskkond kokku ei käi“, 18.05.2026 Why |
| SDE | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Isamaa | Strongly against | Isamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 14 Why |
| Parempoolsed | In favour | Estimated position Why |
-
Reformierakond In favourReformierakonna ja Eesti 200 koalitsioonilepe 2025–2027, lk 8 Why
-
EKRE AgainstEKRE põhiprogramm «Konservatiivne programm», lk 1 Why
-
Keskerakond In favourKeskerakonna valimisplatvorm 2023 «Julgelt inimeste heaks!», rahvastikupoliitika Why
-
Eesti 200 Strongly in favourEesti 200: „Kristina Kallas erakonna volikogul: suurem tossutamine ja kestlik keskkond kokku ei käi“, 18.05.2026 Why
-
SDE In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Isamaa Strongly againstIsamaa valimisprogramm 2023 «Eestluse elujõud», lk 14 Why
-
Parempoolsed In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 3 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test